Sounding Off On Browsers
Today, I just wanted to use the virtual scratchpad to talk about some of the things I don't like about modern browsers. And I'm not singling out any one browser. In my day-to-day activities of researching, working with common application tools, communicating and doing my stuff in the industry, I find that it's not uncommon for me to switch to different browsers for different needs. This is odd because browsers are supposed to do basically the same things.
When I am in the biggest hurry and I don't think I will need to print anything or be dealing with Flash content, then I open Google Chrome. I love its big thumbnails of commonly used sites, multiple tabs and quick start-up and browsing. But the second I go to print something, I am hamstrung because Chrome has no print preview feature. I am usually running from one thing to another, so now I have to jump to another browser to get this basic feature which I am learning is evidently not so basic to program. (I believe other browsers will be launched without this feature the for the first few generations). And if I come across a site with Flash content, Chrome screeches to a halt... it seems that getting the Flash player is difficult or impossible for Chrome. I don't know if this is the fault of Google or Adobe, but I suspect it's a bit of both. I was routed out to get the player for Firefox, which didn't work on the first install attempt. Bad.
On the other hand, on most of my machines, I like Firefox's multiple tabbing system, and its print preview and Flash player installs work just fine... But I find that it is the slowest of all my browsers, which is annoying. And some fairly mainstream web applications (like my banking website) simply choke and die when I run them on this browser. Switching over to Internet Explorer seems to get around this... Again, this may be a problem with how the bank coded their application, not including enough cross-browser support -- but in my workaday tasks, I am governed but what's out there, not by what "they should have done".
And then, finally, although Internet Explorer can be a good happy medium (on my machines, it's medium speed; it has print preview and Flash player compatibility), it has its problems as well. I remained on IE 5.5 or 6, I can't remember which, for the longest time to avoid the complete IE makeover that removed all my menu bars that let me get to common settings and features easily. (A complete makeover that in my opinion was completely unnecessary and counterproductive.) On top of that, IE settings began to become positively fascist with their blocking of common and harmless JavaScript, Flash, and other "active content". Every time I'd turn around, it would be blocking something. And I know I could go back into the security settings and "fix things" but this is also a hassle and a bigger pain when you, like me, use a lot of different computers in your work.
My final analysis -- although the new browser wars are producing some cool new features that the competitors rush to imitate, I for one am still far from ready to declare any one of them the "winner" for all situations.
On the Road,
Eric J. Reid
Eric J. Reid
Labels: browsers
